72Kr run July 2010

 

Target issues

* Target number #429 Y2O3 VD7 + coldline (Cu)

* Beam on target (no converter)

* Mass markers: 40%He, 20%Ne, 20%Kr, 20%Xe

* HRS separator

* Extraction electrode 63 mm (real distance)

* Uht(HRS,CCV)=30.13 kV, Uht(HRS,HT_target)=30.1525 kV, Uanode=130 V, RFQ=30.20 kV, Uht(trap)=30.00kV, Elec05=180 V

 

Yield measurements

From the logbook:

               Thur 8/7    20000 72Kr/uC, w/o slits, in the focal plane of the separator.

               Mon 12/7  2000 72Kr/uC

               Wed 14/7 ???

The experiment suffered from beam contamination, definitely 72Ge from the target (radiogenic or impurity unknown), probably also 72As and possibly 72Ga. Tried to suppress the Ge contamination by positioning the HRS.SL675 using the tape station, and to use the HRS user beam gate. Afterwards isobaric suppression was briefly tried in REXTRAP but the resonance for Kr maintained unclear.

 

Experimental issues

* Beam to Miniball

* IS478

 

Tuning

* Kr beam, 35% VADIS ion efficiency for Kr

* REXTRAP timing free-running relative to protons pulses

* Lowest possible breeding time to minimize charge exchange inside REXTRAP

 

      ISOLDE

           Transmission 80Kr: HRS.FC490=1.87 nA, Trap inj plate 1.16 nA => 62%

           The transmission varied between 55% and 70% depending on tuning conditions.

 

     Low energy

Tperiod=26 ms (readback 26.5 ms), Tbreed=24.4 ms, no beam gate
In TOF_78Kr_GasNe76V.dat we see that 35% of the beam is Ne, the rest 78Kr

Trap inj plate=25.5 pA, RFQ.FC20(17+)=26.3 epA => 6.1% efficiency

Trap efficiency alone (Kr) = 25%

 

     Linac transmission and energy:

            87% RFQ.FC20 to XL65.FC50 for A/q 4, 2.82 MeV/u

            79% RFQ.FC20 to XL65.FC50 for 80Kr19+ A/q 4.21, 2.82 MeV/u

 

    Total estimated transmission (radioactive beam)

              HRS/RFQ x Trap_EBIS x Linac 

              0.65 * 0.06 * 0.8 = 3.1%

 

Delivered beams

* 72Kr and 76Kr – no physics due to low count rate, beam contamination etc

 

2 pulses out of 39, 3E13 ppp

RFQ.FC20 3 epA for 76Kr18+ in the pulse, at Miniball FC 2 epA. 

 

No measureable current for 72Kr

Setting summary

ISOLDE settings saved as:

HRS_SEP_2010-07-13_30280V_80Kr_high_resolution.csv
RFQ-2010-07-13_30280V_80Kr_high_resolution.csv

REX-RFQ-2010-07-06.csv

 

REX settings saved as:

Trap         REX-30kV-2010-07-09-HRS-72Kr.xml
BTS-30kV-2010-07-09-HRS-72Kr.xml

Ebis         EBIS_100709_1434-72Kr.csv

Linac        100709_1437_SEP_72Kr17+_2.83MeVu_mb
100709_1437_72Kr17+_2.83MeVu_mb.csv

Technical problems

* ISOLDE/Booster:  

1. Power supplies in CA0 line periodically malfunctioning.

2. The positioning of the electrode was wrong during the initial setup (CCV given from base plan).

3. Slits HRS.SL675 were left in from Thursday until Saturday evening => reduced the beam   significantly.

4. Slits HRS.SL240 couldn’t be operated. Prevented an easy setup of HRS in high resolving mode.

5. Proton beam position on target changed during the run => mid-run proton scan required.

6. The Booster had a magnet problem stopping the beam for >24 h.

 

* REX low energy:

1. PLC slave on REXTRAP HT platform switched off on Saturday. Stopped the beam for 2 hours.

 

* REX linac

1. IHS and 7gap2 amplifiers stopped several time.

2. The power reference value for 7gap1 amplifier was occasionally stable so the amplifier had to be run in Local mode.

3. Water dripping from the 9-gap heat exchanger.

 

* Miniball

1. The Miniball target was not aligned. This was found out after the run when the Miniball and Sec. 8 were opened. The difficulties steering the beam onto the target without hitting the CD could possibly be explained by this, as well as the low Coulex rate for 72Kr.

 

Comments / Lessons learned

* Used this target for 78Kr and 129Xe implantations in PET for Kolkata institute, India (see separate report by J. Pakarinen).

* Miniball is only collecting data during the EBIS gate and for an equal amount of time off-beam.

* Could operate the EBIS electron beam very stably with an oxygen leak of 3E-10 mbar.

* The Linac transmission for A/q=4 was as high as 88%, while the 80Kr19+ only reached 79% at best.

* Also changes of the target and line heating affected the beam transmission through the separator and RFQ so the line had to be retuned.

* REX was running correctly throughout most of the run.