29,30Na run September
2009
Target issues
* Target number #410
UC2C W-surface
* Beam on target (no converter)
* Mass markers: no mass marker (trace elements 23Na and 39K)
* HRS separator
* RFQ cooler operated in cw mode
* Extraction electrode 50 mm
* Uht(HRS,CCV)=30.34
kV, Uht(HRS, HT_target)=30.3371
kV, Uht(RFQ cooler)=30.20 kV, RFQ extraction=0 V, Uht(trap)=30.00kV, Elec05=165 V
Yield tests by target group.
Measured 27Na and 26Na – wait
for result from target group
Estimation
30Na and 29Na – wait for estimation from target group
Experimental issues
* Beam to Miniball
* IS482
Tuning
* Normal extraction from EBIS
* REXTRAP timing free-running relative to protons pulses
ISOLDE
133Cs
HRS.FC490=1.43
nA, HRS.FC748=1.20 nA , CA0.FC68=1.16 nA, Trap inj plate=1.14 nA
=> Overall transmission from HRS.FC490 to trap inj plate=80%
RFQ transmission could not be tested for light elements due to lack of mass
marker.
Low energy
Stable beam 23Na
Tperiod=15 ms, Tbreeding=13
ms
Trap inj. plate=16 pA, RFQ.FC20(22+)=15 pA
Trap+EBIS
efficiency=13%
Linac transmission and energy:
85% RFQ.FC20 to
XL65.FC50 for A/q=4, 2.85 MeV/u
Total estimated transmission for
radioactive beam (best case)
HRS.FC490_to_trap x Trap_EBIS
x Linac x MBcollimator
0.80*0.13*0.85*0.84=7.4%
Delivered
beams
For both beams: Tperiod=20 ms, Tbreed=13 ms, no beam gate
Icoll=192 mA, optimised
for Na7+
* 30Na7+
Contamination from Isolde: Al, Mg
Contamination from EBIS Z>=20 removed with separator 3mm slits
Beam composition of radioactive part (ignoring
EBIS components): 12 % Na, 4 % Mg, 84 % Al
When
running with 19 pulses out of 40 pulses, 1.8uA
Total
beam intensity ~ 4E+4, Na intensity ~5E+3
* 29Na7+
When
running with 17 out of 41 pulses, 1.6 uA proton beam
Possibly 0.05 to 0.1 epA on RFQ.FC20
Setting summary
For HRS we used:
* HRS-SEP-9-09-02-30340.csv
* RFQ-9-09-01-30340.csv
* RFQ-REX-9-09-01-30340.csv
REX low energy settings saved as:
*
REX-30kV-2009-09-04_HRS_23Na.xml
*
BTS-30kV-2009-09-04_HRS_23Na.xml
*
EBIS_2009-09-04_HRS_23Na_normalextraction_last.csv
REX separator and linac base settings saved as:
*
090819_0900_SEP_Aq4_2.85MeVu_88%_L65.csv
* 090904_1641_30Na7+_2.85MeVu.csv
Technical problems
* XIHS.MQ50 interlock
badly connected on the PS caused a few trips
* REXEBIS dsc
(cfv-170-rxpow) stopped a few times. Didn’t affect the beam
to the experiment.
Comments / Lessons learned
*
We could change between light (29,30Na) and heavy
beams 200Po with short notice. Some retuning of the trap injection was required
to have an optimized transmission.
* 15 ms trap cooling was sufficient even if it wasn’t actually used.